Jago Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4824 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-99 Year-2018 Thana- LAXMIPUR District- Jamui ====================================================== 1.

JAGO YADAV SON OF LATE SHYAMLAL YADAV R/O VILLAGEFOKSA, P.O. AND P.S.- JHAJHA, DISTRICT- JAMUI 2.

GUDDU YADAV SON OF LATE JUGO YADAV @ YUGAL YADAV R/O VILLAGE- FOKSA, P.O. AND P.S.- JHAJHA, DISTRICT- JAMUI ... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajit Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s:

Mr.Anuj Kumar Shrivastava, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 23-08-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned APP for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Laxmipur P.S. Case No. 99 of 2018, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 452, 457, 382 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation, in the midnight at about 12.00 a.m., some unknown persons after entering into the house of the informant committed theft of ornaments detailed in the FIR. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that they were not arrested at the spot. Nothing was recovered from their pos-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4824 of 2022(2) dt.23-08-2022 2/2 session. Their names have been figured in the confessional statement of co-accused.

On perusal of paragraph No. 3 of the bail petition it appears that the petitioners have strong criminal antecedent of similar nature of the case. As such, they do not deserve the privilege for anticipatory bail. Accordingly, it is rejected. Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioners within the stipulated time provided in para-1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) SONALI/- U T