Shatrughan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2914 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-192 Year-2019 Thana- LADANIA District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.

Shatrughan Yadav, Son of Ramnath Yadav, Resident of Village- Yogia, P.S.- Ladaniya, District- Madhubani.

2.

Pramod Yadav @ Pramod Kumar Son of Rajendra Yadav Resident of Village- Yogia, P.S.- Ladaniya, District- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ravindra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Akbar Ali ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 24-01-2020 This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Ladaniya P. S. Case No. 192 of 2019, disclosing offences under Sections 272 & 273/34 of IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The police on information raided the place of occurrence, on seeing the police party, seven persons came on the cycle carrying bag containing liquor, but seeing the police party one co-accused succeeded in fleeing away from the spot throwing the bag containing liquor and petitioner was also identified by the local Chowkidar along with other accused persons. There is recovery of 648 liters of Nepali liquor from the paddy field owned by those persons.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2914 of 2020(2) dt.24-01-2020 2/2 is that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case at the instance of the local Chowkidar. They have no criminal antecedent.

Heard learned A.P.P. also, who has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail on the ground of recovery. Having heard both sides, in view of the allegation and the quantity of the liquor recovered, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. However, they have to surrender before the learned court below and make prayer for regular bail, the same shall be considered on its own merit, without being prejudiced by this order. With the aforesaid, this application is dismissed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sunil Shukla/- U T