Rakesh Nut v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6055 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-181 Year-2025 Thana- AMNAUR District- Saran ====================================================== Rakesh Nut Son of Late Ram Chandra Nut Resident of Village - Olhanpur, P.S. - Marhowrah, Dist. - Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mili Kumari For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 04-02-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Amnaur P.S. Case No. 181 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 305(a) of the BNS.

3. As per allegation, in the night of the incident, unknown persons allegedly committed theft in three houses, including the house of the informant, by breaking open the houses and boxes and allegedly stole gold and silver ornaments along with cash.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He has further submitted that the petitioner's confessional statement was elicited in another case, and thereafter he was remanded in eight cases, including the present one.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6055 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 2/2 Nothing was recovered from his possession. The stolen mangalsutra was recovered from the house of the co-accused, which is alleged to have been recovered on the basis of the petitioner's confessional statement, but the mangalsutra was not put on TIP. The petitioner has been in custody since 27.07.2025.

5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.

6. It appears that, except for criminal antecedents, there is nothing in the present case implicating the petitioner. He has remained in custody for more than six months.

7. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above-named, is directed to furnish bail bond and on doing so, the court below shall release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-Ist Class, Saran Chapra/concerned court in connection with Amnaur P.S. Case No. 181 of 2025, subject to the following conditions that the petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Nirmal/- U T