Urmila Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5526 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1528 Year-2019 Thana- BHAGALPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== URMILA DEVI Wife of Sri Shaligram Paswan Resident of Village - Satnagar, P.S. - Goradih, District - Bhagalpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Ashok Paswan Son of Sri Brahmdeo Paswan Resident of Village - Satnagar, P.S. - Goradih, District - Bhagalpur.
3.
Binod Paswan Son of Late Soni Paswan Resident of Village - Satnagar, P.S. - Goradih, District - Bhagalpur.
4.
Amrit Paswan son of Sheshan Paswan Resident of Village - Satnagar, P.S. - Goradih, District - Bhagalpur.
5.
Kunal Paswan Son of Sheshan Paswan Resident of Village - Satnagar, P.S. - Goradih, District - Bhagalpur.
6.
Ajit Paswan Son of Nageshwar Paswan Resident of Village - Satnagar, P.S. - Goradih, District - Bhagalpur.
7.
Nageshwar Paswan Son of Sri Babulal Paswan Resident of Village - Satnagar, P.S. - Goradih, District - Bhagalpur. 8.
Manish Paswan son of Sri Babulal Paswan Resident of Village - Satnagar, P.S. - Goradih, District - Bhagalpur.
9.
Pramod Paswan Son of Basudeo Paswan Resident of Village - Satnagar, P.S. - Goradih, District - Bhagalpur.
10.
Yadunandan Paswan Son of Sri Kishan Das Resident of Village - Satnagar, P.S. - Goradih, District - Bhagalpur.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Vivekanand Vivek, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Raj Kishore Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-02-2024 Heard learned counsels for the parties.
2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this quashing application, granting liberty to the petitioner to raise all the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5526 of 2022(2) dt.21-02-2024 2/2 points which have been raised in the present application, before the learned court below, at the appropriate stage.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. This quashing application stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as indicated above.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T