Jitendra Kumar Prajapati v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7021 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-153 Year-2023 Thana- ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE DistrictRohtas ====================================================== Jitendra Kumar Prajapati S/O Shiv Nandan Prajapati R/O vill.- Lohra Banua,P.S- Nauhatta, Dist- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Pushpa Devi @ Pushpa Kumari D/O Late Ram Chandra Prasad, W/O Jitendra Kumar Prajapati R/O VIll.- Jakkhi Bigha Ward No.-25, P.s- Dehri, P.O- Dalmianagar, Dist- Rohtas.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kanhiya Kishor ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 14-10-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Section 498 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Complaint Case No. 153 of 2023.

3. The matter originates from the matrimonial discord.

4. Both the parties are present in Chambers with their respective counsels, casting allegations and counter allegation against each other.

5. For the purpose of negotiating peace with the warring couple to save their marriage and also keeping in view

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7021 of 2025(5) dt.14-10-2025 2/3 the welfare of the children born out of their wedlock, earlier the matter was referred to the Patna High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. The report of the learned Mediator shows that the dispute has been resolved through the process of mediation with the terms of agreement being attached with the mediation report at Flag-M.

6. The learned counsel for the complainant has submitted that the petitioner has continuously been torturing the victim even after the agreement being reached at between them. So it is not possible for the victim to live with her husband.

7. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is a labourer in Delhi and does not have such means to give the amount of maintenance.

8. Considering the above facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks from the date of communication of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class Dehrion-Sone, Rohtas, in connection with Complaint Case No. 153 of 2023 subject to the followings conditions:- (i). The petitioner shall make payment of Rs.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7021 of 2025(5) dt.14-10-2025 3/3 2000/- each (Rupees two thousand) per month, as an interim maintenance, to his children. He is also directed to pay Rs. 2000/- ((Rupees two thousand) per month to the complainant (o.p.no.2), as an interim maintenance.

(ii). If the petitioner fails to pay the amount of interim maintenance to his children and the complainant on two dates consecutively, his bail bond shall stand cancelled.

9. The Complainant is directed to furnish her saving bank account number in the court below at the time of furnishing bail bond by the petitioner. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) HR/- U T