Dablu Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4246 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-413 Year-2019 Thana- BOCHAHAN District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== DABLU SINGH S/O SRI BIPIN SINGH R/v- Gharbhara, P.S.- Bochahan, District- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Mr. Ritwik Thakur with Ms. Vaishnavi Singh, Advocates For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jagdhar Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 05-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioner along with others is of killing the daughter of the informant, due to non-fulfillment of further dowry demand.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. Petitioner is the husband of the deceased. Petitioner was working at Nagdoi in Jeans factory in Delhi and was doing stitching work and even at the relevant time, he was in Delhi. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4246 of 2023(4) dt.05-07-2023 2/2 13.04.2022.

Learned APP for the State has opposed the application for bail and submitted that petitioner is the husband of the deceased and the sole responsibility of taking care of deceased is against her husband/petitioner but he did not do so. From the perusal of the FSL report of the deceased, it appears that 'Carbofuran' was detected and it is commercially known as Furadan, which is highly poisonous. During investigation several witnesses have also supported the prosecution case. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considering the nature of allegation, this court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and, as such, his prayer for bail stands rejected.

The trial Court is directed to conclude the trial expeditiously.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U T