Patna High CourtC.R./1813/1986dfd for non appearance

Ram Dhyan Singh v. State And ORS

2015-01-29The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Revision No.1813 of 1986 ====================================================== Ram Dhyan Singh son of Kali Singh, resident of Village Jagmalbigha, PS Fatwah, Pargana Bhimpur, District Patna .... The petitioner in the court below .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Collector of Patna

3. Smt. Vidyawati Devi wife of Sarbanand Singh of village Chechaul, PS Naubatpur, District Patna, at present Chhotki Nawadah PS Fatwah, Distt. Patna ... all objectors in the court below .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== with First Appeal No.550 of 1986 ====================================================== Ramdhyan Singh son of Kali Singh, resident of Village Jagmalbigha, PS Fatwah, Pargana Bhimpur, District Patna .... The petitioner in the court below .... .... Appellant

Versus

1. Smt.Vidyawati Devi wife of Sarbanand Singh of village Chechaul, PS Naubatpur, District Patna, at present Chhotki Nawadah PS Fatwah, Distt. Patna ... objector in the court below .... .... Respondent 1st Party

2. The Collector of Patna

3. The State of Bihar .......... Respondents 2nd set .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

(In. No.CR No. 1813 of 1986) For the Petitioner/s :

For the Respondent 1 & 2 : Mr. Devendra Kumar Sinha, Sr. Advocate AAG 2 Mr. Biresh Kumar Sinha, AC to AAG 2 (In FA No.550 of 1986)

Patna High Court C.R. No.1813 of 1986 (9) dt.29-01-2015 2/2 For the Appellant/s :

For the Respondents nos. 2 & 3 : Mr. Devendra Kumar Sinha, Sr. Advocate AAG 2 Mr. Biresh Kumar Sinha, AC to AAG 2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 29-01-2015 The matter was listed yesterday for hearing. Since there was no representation for the petitioner as well as the appellant, it was directed to be listed for dismissal. There is no representation today also.

Hence, the Revision application is dismissed in default.

First Appeal no. 550 of 1986 also stands dismissed in default.

(L. Narasimha Reddy,CJ) mrl U