← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/3316/2017dfd for non appearance

Bhushan Prasad And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2025-03-18Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3316 of 2017 ====================================================== 1.

Bhushan Prasad Son of Hori Prasad, resident of village - Gidari, P.S. Sare, District - Nalanda 2.

Bilas Jamadar, Son of Late Lotan Jamadar, resident of village - Hargawa, P.S. Sare, District - Nalanda 3.

Naresh Yadav, Son of Late Raghunath Yadav, resident of village Amba Bigha, P.S. Sare, District - Nalanda 4.

Raju Choudhary, Son of Late Jamun Choudhary, resident of village - Harawan, P.S. Sare, District - Nalanda 5.

Bhola Prasad, Son of Late Bisho Mahto, resident of village - Gilari, P.S. Sare, District - Nalanda 6.

Bishwanath Choudhary, Son of Late Sundar Choudhary, resident of village - Gilari, P.S. Sare, District - Nalanda 7.

Uchit Bind, Son of Nandu Bind, resident of village - Malti, P.S. Sare, District - Nalanda 8.

Kaushlendra Prasad, Son of Late Shiv Nandan Prasad, resident of village - Kalla, P.S. Sare, District - Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Principal Secretary, Fishery Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3.

The Registrar, Co - Operative Societies, Bihar, Patna 4.

The District Fishery Officer - Cum - Chief Executive Officer, Nalanda, District - Nalanda 5.

Bindeshwar Jamadar, S/o Ram Prasad Jamadar, resident of village - Amawan, P.S. Bind, District - Nalanda ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Md.Khurshid Alam-Aag12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 18-03-2025 None appeared on behalf of the petitioners, despite repeated calls.

2. On earlier two occasions as well, none had

Patna High Court CWJC No.3316 of 2017(6) dt.18-03-2025 2/2 appeared on behalf of the petitioners.

3. The State is, however, represented.

4. The writ application is accordingly dismissed in default.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) HR/- U