Chandan Singh @ Chandan Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14976 of 2016 (3) dt.17-05-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.14976 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -373 Year- 2015 Thana -SIWAN MUFFASIL District- SIWAN ======================================================
1. Chandan Singh @ Chandan Kumar Singh Son of Bishundeo Singh resident of village - Aini, Police Station Darauli, District - Siwan .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. M. Rab, (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 17-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the Sate.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Siwan Muffasil P.S. Case No. 373 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 386, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegedly, the petitioner being in custody in Siwan Jail demanded ransom of Rs. 5,00,000/- from the informant through mobile no. 07256862464 and after half an hour co-accused Deepak Singh the younger brother of the petitioner along with 4 unknown came at the house of the informant, started abusing and searching the informant.
Submission is of false implication and that there is no legal and tangible material against the petitioner, admittedly, the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14976 of 2016 (3) dt.17-05-2016 petitioner was in jail custody at the relevant time, the informant has filed compromise petition also and as such the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration.
Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail by submitting that the petitioner has got criminal antecedent of serious offences and witnesses have supported the allegation during investigation. In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the criminal antecedent of the petitioner, at present, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail, accordingly, his such prayer stands rejected. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer of bail after examination of the informant during trial. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T