Lotta Yadav @ Dinesh Yadav @ Lota Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3089 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-264 Year-2017 Thana- BARH District- Patna ====================================================== LOTTA YADAV @ DINESH YADAV @ LOTA YADAV S/o Chandra Shekhar Rai @ Bam Rai, Resident of Village- Jalgovind, P.S.- Barh, DistrictPatna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bhaskar Shankar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Sumiran Rai, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 22-02-2022 Heard both sides.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Barh P.S. Case No.264 of 2017 registered under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case merely on the basis of suspicion.

The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail by contending that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. It is further submitted that there is allegation of firing on the chest of the son (deceased) of the informant against the petitioner and others. Therefore, the petitioner does not deserve anticipatory

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3089 of 2020(6) dt.22-02-2022 2/2 bail.

Having considered the facts aforesaid, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected. Harish/- (Arvind Srivastava, J) U T