Ram Bali Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.251 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-130 Year-2018 Thana- KALYANPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Ram Bali Mahto Son of Pritam Mahto Resident of Village - Khajuri, P.S.- Kalyanpur, District - Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sujit Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 11-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 130 of 2018 registered for offences under sections 363, 366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

In the present case, an allegation has been made against the petitioner to have kidnapped the daughter of the Informant.

In the statement made under Section 164 Cr.P.C., the girl has stated that she had voluntarily gone along with the petitioner who had visited different colleges for the purpose of her admission. In the statement, she has specifically stated that her father, under the wrong impression, has lodged the present

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.251 of 2019(2) dt.11-01-2019 2/2 case against the petitioner.

Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, namely, Ram Bali Mahto, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 130 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also subject to condition that whenever the police will call the petitioner for investigation/interrogation, he will remain present and if he would not present himself, the privilege of grant of anticipatory bail shall be deemed to have been canceled.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U T