Patna High CourtCR. MISC./4664/2026bail granted

Ashish Thakur @ Ashish Kumar Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

2026-01-28Mr. Justice S. B. P. Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4664 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-235 Year-2025 Thana- PANDAUL District- Madhubani ====================================================== Ashish Thakur @ Ashish Kumar Thakur S/o Binod Thakur @ Mahanand Thakur R/o Village- Sahpur, P.S- Pandaul, Dist- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Subhash Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Suman Kumari Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in connection with Pandaul P.S. Case No. 235 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under sections 310(4), 310(5) of the BNS and Section 25 (1-B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. As per allegation in the FIR, on getting secret information about assembly of miscreants to hatch a conspiracy, police party proceeded towards Sarhjad Chowk. On seeing the police party, accused persons started fleeing away but three of them were apprehended by the police wherein arms were recovered from possession of apprehended co-accused Md. Sadare. From possession of this petitioner, one mobile phone was recovered.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4664 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026 2/2 that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. No TIP has been done till date. There is no eye witness of the alleged occurrence. Nothing has been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner except a mobile, of which he is the registered owner. After completion of investigation, chargesheet has been submitted against him. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 12.10.2025, without having any criminal antecedent.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Madhubani in connection with Pandaul P.S. Case No. 235 of 2025.

(S. B. Pd. Singh, J) Ankit Kumar/- U