Hasibur Rahman v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.542 of 2021 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1029 of 2020 ====================================================== 1.

Hasibur Rahman Son of Md. Muslim, resident of Village- Islampur, P.s. Jhaua, District- Katihar.

2.

Shri Ram Sah, Son of Shyamnandan Sah, resident of Village-Kachora, P.S. Kadwa, District-Katihar.

3.

Kamaldeo Mandal, Son of Mantu Mandal, resident of Village-Kachora, P.S. Kadwa, District-Katihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Sri Kumar Ravi, the Principal Secretary, Department of Road Construction, Bihar, Patna. 2.

Mr. Kanwal Tanuj, District Magistrate-cum-District Collector, Katihar. 3.

Mr. Vijay Kumar, Addl. Collector, Katihar.

4.

Mr. Vivek Kumar, Land Acquisition Officer, Katihar. 5.

Mr. Warsa Singh, District Development Commissioner, Katihar. 6.

Mr. Pawan Kumar Mandal, S.D.O. Barsoi, Katihar. 7.

Mr. Raja Ram Singh, Executive Engineer, Department of Road Construction, Katihar.

8.

Mr. Dinesh Kumar Rai, Executive Engineer, Department of Rural Works, Katihar.

9.

Mr. Arvind Kumar, Superintending Engineer, Department of Road Construction, Katihar.

10.

Mr. Ravi Shankar Sinha, Circle Officer, Kadwa, District-Katihar. 11.

Md. Zulfikar Adil, Block Development Officer, Kadwa, District-Katihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Binay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar Ambastha (SC-26) Mr. Santosh Kumar Mishra, AC to SC-26 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 12-03-2026 Heard the parties.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s):

Patna High Court MJC No.542 of 2021(3) dt.12-03-2026 2/2 "for initiating contempt proceeding against the opp. Parties for willful and deliberate violation of the order dated 20.01.2020 passed in CWJC No. 1029 of 2020."

3. First supplementary-show cause on behalf of the opposite parties in on record and learned State counsel has taken this Court to the order dated 13.04.2022 to show that the District Land Acquisition Officer, Katihar has rejected the claim of the petitioner as not maintainable.

4. Granting liberty to agitate the matter, MJC No. 542 of 2021 stands disposed of.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Adnan/- U