Kedar Ram v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 6138 of 2017 =========================================================== Kedar Ram Son of Late Laxu Paswan, Resident of Village- Bearbandh, PostDumri Shahpur, Police Station- Sheosagar, District- Rohtas at Sasaram. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department.

2. The District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram.

3. The District Panchayat Officer, Rohtas at Sasaram.

4. The District Account Officer, Rohtas at Sasaram.

5. The District Provident Fund Officer, Rohtas at Sasaram.

6. The Block Development Officer, Dinara, District Rohtas at Sasaram.

7. The Block Development Officer, Nauhata, District Rohtas at Sasaram.

8. The Block Development Officer, Karaghar District, Rohtas at Sasaram.

9. The Block Development Officer, Dawath, District Rohtas at Sasaram.

10. The Block Development Officer, Akorhigola, District Rohtas at Sasaram.

11. The Accountant General, Bihar- II, (A & E), Birchand Patel Path, Patna. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 09-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; State and Accountant General.

2. In view of the materials brought on record including the 3rd supplementary counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents no. 2, 3, 4 and 10, it appears that the petitioner has been granted the benefit of 3rd MACP. However, the affidavit is silent with regard to the consequential recalculation which is required to be made on the basis of grant of such 3rd MACP to the petitioner.

3. Learned counsel for the State submitted that within

Patna High Court CWJC No.6138 of 2017 dt.09-03-2018 2/2 two weeks, the authorities shall ensure that whatever revision has to be made on account of such grant of 3rd MACP, shall be done.

4. Having considered the matter and the stand taken by learned counsel for the State, the writ petition stands disposed off with a direction to the respondents no. 2, 3 and 10 to ensure that the payment to the petitioner arising out of grant of 3rd MACP is paid to him expeditiously and latest within four weeks from the date of production of a copy of this order before them.

5. It goes without saying that the payment under various heads shall be made with the admissible statutory interest. Learned counsel for the Accountant General shall also ensure that pursuant to sanction order by the State authorities, authority in favour of the petitioner is issued within a week of receipt of such sanction order. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) Anand Kr.

AFR/NAFR U