Raju Kumar @ Raju Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3099 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-468 Year-2024 Thana- SASARAM NAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== Raju Kumar @ Raju Singh S/O Late Bajrangi Singh R/O VillageChintawanpur, P.S.- Dhaudadh, Darigaon, Distt.- Rohtas. At PresentMohalla- Alamganj, P.S.- Sasaram (T), Dist.- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rang Nath Dwiwedi, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Shakir Ahmad, A.P.P.

For the Informant :

Mr. Sanjay Sinha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 08-05-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 379, 427, 448, 504, 506 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code as well as Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of two cases but then one of the cases was instituted by the instant informant and the other case was instituted by his own uncle. It is further submitted that in one of the cases the police, after investigation, exonerated the petitioner of the allegation. It is next submitted that petitioner is stepbrother of the informant and there is a dispute relating to property as such the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant alleging that he

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3099 of 2025(3) dt.08-05-2025 2/2 came and assaulted and even demolished the house. It is also submitted that the house belongs to the petitioner also as such why he would have demolished the house. It is further submitted that even the injury suffered by the injured is simple in nature.

4. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner but are not in a position to rebut the submission of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner and the informant are stepbrother.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Sasaram (Town) P.S. (Darigaon O.P.) Case No. 468 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T