Gangiya Devi v. The Union Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6122 of 2017 ====================================================== Gangiya Devi Wife of Sureshwar Yadav, Resident of village - Jamaluddin Chak, Neura Road, P.O. P.S. Khagaul, District - Patna 801105 ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union of India through Secretary, Department of Railway, Railway Bhawan, New Delhi.

2.

The Secretary, Department of Railway, Railway Bhawan, New Delhi 3.

The Chief Engineer Construction, Eastern Railway, Danapur Division, Danapur 4.

The Deputy Chief Engineer Construction, Eastern Railway, Danapur Division, Danapur 5.

The Chief Manager, E.M. Railway, Hajipur Bihar 6.

The District Magistrate, Patna 7.

The District Magistrate, Saran 8.

The A.D.M., Patna Land Acquistion 9.

The A.D.M., Saran Land Acquisition 10.

The District Land Acquisition officer, Patna 11.

The District Land Acquisition officer, Saran 12.

The Sub - Divisional Officer, Patna Sadar, District Patna 13.

The Circle Officer, Danapur, District - Patna 14.

The Circle Officer, Sonepur, District - Saran 15.

The Personnel Officer, Eastern Railway, Kolkata ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Gautam Shah,Adv.

For the State :

Mr.Sajid Salim Khan -SC25 For the Union of India :

Mr.Awadhesh Kr.Pandey, Sr.CGC Mr.R.K.Sharma,CGC Mr.Lokesh,Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 17-04-2023 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1.That in this writ application, the claim/ case of the petitioner is similar to those

Patna High Court CWJC No.6122 of 2017(2) dt.17-04-2023 2/2 petitioners in C.W.J.C. No. 8283/2005 (Amod Kumar and others Vs. The Union of India and Others) whose case/ claim has been decided by the Hon'ble Justice Mr.

Ajay Kumar Tripathi on 27.09.2012 by speaking order and similarly situated C.W.J.C. No. 22632/2013 (Sanjay Kumar & Others Vs. The Union of India & Others) has been decided by Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.K.

Mandal vide order dated 10.08.2016."

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, for redressal of her aforesaid grievances. Liberty so sought is granted.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/SonalU