Raja Ram Yadav @ Raja Ram Yadava v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6160 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-194 Year-2022 Thana- BELAGANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.
Raja Ram Yadav @ Raja Ram Yadava S/O Babu Chand Yadav Resident of Village- Shiv Rampur, P.S.- Belaganj, District- Gaya, 2.
Santu Kumar @ Santu Yadav S/o Raja Ram Yadav @ Raja Ram Yadava Resident of Village- Shiv Rampur, P.S.- Belaganj, District- Gaya, 3.
Pintu Yadav @ Pintu Kumar S/o Raja Ram Yadav @ Raja Ram Yadava Resident of Village- Shiv Rampur, P.S.- Belaganj, District- Gaya, 4.
Sujit Kumar @ Sujit Yadav S/O Raja Ram Yadav @ Raja Ram Yadava Resident of Village- Shiv Rampur, P.S.- Belaganj, District- Gaya, 5.
Sinki Yadav @ Sinki Kumari W/O Santu Yadav @ Santu Kumar Resident of Village- Shiv Rampur, P.S.- Belaganj, District- Gaya, ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Gajendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Anant Kumar 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 10-06-2025
1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Belaganj Police Station Case No. 194 of 2022, disclosing offences punishable under Sections 147/148/149/341/323/ 324/307/379/448/504 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The prosecution case, as per the First Information Report, is that on 06.05.2022, at about 11 AM, the petitioners,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6160 of 2025(3) dt.10-06-2025 2/3 along with other co-accused persons, started digging the public lane and when the informant protested, all the accused persons abused him and the petitioner no. 1 assaulted him by means of garasa, due to which he sustained head injury. The petitioner no. 2 assaulted the daughter-in-law on her hand, co-accused Mantu Yadav assaulted Keshami Devi and snatched her gold locket and ear-ring, the petitioner nos. 3 and 4 assaulted the grandson of the informant and the petitioner no. 5 assaulted one Usha Devi by brick.
4. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case due to land dispute. He further submits that both the parties are agnates and there was a dispute with regard to the passage between the parties. He further submits that five persons, including the informant, have sustained injuries, but all are simple in nature caused by hard and blunt substance.
5. Regards being had to the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties and taking into consideration the fact that both the parties are angates, there appears to be previous land dispute between the parties and the injuries sustained
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6160 of 2025(3) dt.10-06-2025 3/3 by the informant and others are simple in nature, I am inclined to grant the petitioners privilege of anticipatory bail.
6. This application is, accordingly, allowed.
7. Let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 2nd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in connection with Belaganj Police Station Case No. 194 of 2022, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Anil Kumar Sinha, J.) Prabhakar Anand/- U √ T √