Agindeo Ram @ Agnideo Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5097 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-60 Year-2021 Thana- MAKER District- Saran ====================================================== Agindeo Ram @ Agnideo Ram S/o Late Sugive Ram @ Sugrim Ram @ Sugriv Ram R/o vill- Garauna Bhagwanpur, Ps- Dariyapur, District- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nityanand Tiwari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 11-03-2026 Heard Mr. Rajesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. Nityanand Tiwari, learned APP for the State and perused the case diary.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Maker P.S. Case No. 60 of 2021, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 427, 307, 436 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that some unknown miscreants have set three vehicles of the company on fire and while fleeing away, they also fired.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. No

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5097 of 2026(3) dt.11-03-2026 2/3 incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. Name of the petitioner has transpired in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Chandeshwar Sahani. It is further submitted that no specific allegation has been attributed against the petitioner rather the same is general and omnibus in nature. The petitioner is in custody since 29.03.2025 and has got eleven criminal antecedents.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail after framing of charge, if not already framed on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Maker P.S. Case No. 60 of 2021, subject to the following conditions:

(I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5097 of 2026(3) dt.11-03-2026 3/3 the family of the petitioner.

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T