Munindra Kumar Sharma @ Munna Sharma @ Munindra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.13152 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -805 Year- 2015 Thana -AHIAPUR District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. MUNINDRA KUMAR SHARMA @ MUNNA SHARMA @ MUNINDRA KUMAR son of Ram Swaroop Sharma, resident of VillageChaturi Punas, P.S. Ahiyapur, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjit Kumar Thakur For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dinesh Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 23-06-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case for the offences punishable under sections 406, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the I.P.C Allegedly, the petitioner posing himself as Praveen Kumar Son of Bishwanath Prasad Singh and after showing forged document executed a deed of agreement in favour of husband of the informant and cheated Rs. 5,00,001/- and thereafter when the petitioner was caught by husband of the informant he accepted in writing to return the amount but he only returned Rs. 1,24,000/- and in the meantime husband of the informant was killed and the petitioner is evading to return the said amount.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13152 of 2016 (6) dt.23-06-2016 2/2 Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 18.01.2016, all the allegations are concocted one, the petitioner has not executed any paper and as such he deserves sympathetic consideration as charge sheet has already been submitted and there is no chance of tampering with the prosecution evidence, to which the learned A.P.P. opposes.

In the facts and circumstances as stated above, considering detention of the petitioner at this stage, now he is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Muzaffarpur in Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 805 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/- U T