Shambhu Prasad Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.23673 of 2018 ====================================================== Shambhu Prasad Yadav Son of Late Ram Chandra Rai Resident of Village Gosaipur, P.O.- Hersher, P.S.- Siwaipatti, Anchal- Meenapur, DistrictMuzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

The Principal Secretary Land Acquisition Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate Muzaffarpur.

4.

District Land Acquisition Officer Muzaffarpur. 5.

Senior Project Engineer Bihar Rajya Pool Nirman Nigam Bhagwanpur, Muzaffarpur.

6.

Anchal Adhikari Motipur District- Muzaffarpur. 7.

Shankar Rai Son of Ramcharitra Rai Resident of Village Morsandi, P.S. and Anchal Motipur, District- Muzaffarpur.

8.

Ram Prabesh Rai Son of Shiv Shankar Rai Resident of Village Morsandi, P.S. and Anchal Motipur, District- Muzaffarpur. 9.

Indragit Rai Son of Shiv Shankar Rai Resident of Village Morsandi, P.S. and Anchal Motipur, District- Muzaffarpur.

10.

Ram Lalit Rai Son of Shiv Shankar Rai Resident of Village Morsandi, P.S. and Anchal Motipur, District- Muzaffarpur.

11.

Manoj Rai Son of Shiv Shankar Rai Resident of Village Morsandi, P.S. and Anchal Motipur, District- Muzaffarpur.

12.

Draupdi Devi Wife of Ram Pravesh Rai Resident of Village Morsandi, P.S. and Anchal Motipur, District- Muzaffarpur.

13.

Vijay Kumar Son of Deo Nandan Rai Resident of Village Morsandi, P.S. and Anchal Motipur, District- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arun Kumar, Adv.

For the Resp. No. 5 :

Ms. Binita Sinha, Adv.

For the State :

Md. Khurshid Alam, AAG-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 19-11-2025 Heard the parties.

2. The present application has been preferred for the

Patna High Court CWJC No.23673 of 2018(2) dt.19-11-2025 2/2 following relief(s):

To issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ or writs direction or directions commanding upon the respondents to restrain the respondents in making payment of the compensation amount of the land in question to the respondent no.6 to 12 and direct them to pay the same to the petitioner who is the real owner of the land in question Without any notice to the petitioner the compensation has been fixed in the name of respondent nos. 6 to 12 with interest of the grant rate.

To pass any such other order or orders has this Hon'ble court thinks fit and proper.

3. It has been informed by learned counsel for the petitioner that the sole petitioner is no more and as such, liberty be granted to the heirs to agitate the matter if he/she/they so want.

4. State has no objection.

5. In that background, the writ petition is disposed of. (Rajiv Roy, J) Vijay Singh/- U