Pappu Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5810 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-110 Year-2025 Thana- PURUSHOTTAMPUR District- West Champaran ====================================================== Pappu Mahto son of Dinanath Mahto Resident Of Village- Madhuri PsPurushottampur District- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 28-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Purushottampur P.S. Case No. 110 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Sections 191(1), 191(2), 109(1), 115(2), 303(2), 352, 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. Prosecution case, in short, is that on 30.08.2025, the petitioner Pappu Mahto along with named and unknown accused, armed with deadly weapons, intercepted the informant and his family, robbed 1,50,000/- at gunpoint, and assaulted ₹ the informant, his father, and brother, causing bleeding injuries and fracture.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that general and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5810 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026 2/2 omnibus allegation has been made against the petitioner. No specific overt act is alleged against the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that as per the injury report as discussed in the impugned order, no corroborative injury report has been sustained by the injured. He further submitted that the injuries are simple in nature. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 22.10.2025 and has no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Purushottampur P.S. Case No. 110 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T