Patna High CourtCR. MISC./4584/2022rejected

Sanny Chaudhary @ Sanny Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-09-26Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4584 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-249 Year-2019 Thana- JANDAHA District- Vaishali ====================================================== Sanny Chaudhary @ Sanny Kumar S/O Surendra Chaudhary, R/O VillageKutubpur Saidpur, P.S.- Bidupur, Dist.- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajeev Ranjan No.Ii For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 26-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

It is a case of commission of murder of the husband of the informant. The informant alleged that since her husband had business rivalry with the petitioner and he had threatened earlier to kill the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4584 of 2022(4) dt.26-09-2022 2/3 husband of the informant, the petitioner might have killed her husband.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. There is no eye witness to the occurrence and the petitioner has also no concern with the alleged occurrence. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Learned A.P.P appearing on behalf of the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submitted that there is circumstantial evidence against the petitioner to connect the petitioner with the crime. During investigation, the witnesses have also supported the prosecution case. The postmortem report also suggests the cause of death due to firearm injuries.

In the facts and circumstance of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4584 of 2022(4) dt.26-09-2022 3/3 The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner stands rejected.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Shageer/- U T