Akhilesh Kumar Singh @ Akhilesh Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.23428 of 2018 ====================================================== Akhilesh Kumar Singh @ Akhilesh Singh Son of Vijay Bahdur Singh Resident of Village- Majhari, Police Station- Mohania, Post Office- Kathej, District- Kaimur at Bhabhua. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar through Collector-cum- District Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabhua.
2.
The Sub- Divisional Lok Shikayat Nivaran Padadhikari, Mohania, DistrictKaimur at Bhabhua. 3.
The Sub- Divisional Officer, Mohania, District- Kaimur. 4.
The Circle Officer, Mohania, District- Kaimur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Sajid Salim Khan, SC-25 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 19-02-2026 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner though the State is present.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s:
(i) for issuance of writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ for quashing the order dated 31.7.2018 passed in Bihar Public Land Encroachment Case No. 08/2018 by the Circle Officer, Mohaniya, Kaimur (Respondent No. 4), whereby the proceeding of the encroachment case has been stayed only on the account of that the Title Suit bearing No. 772/2018 is
Patna High Court CWJC No.23428 of 2018(6) dt.19-02-2026 2/2 pending before the Court of Learned Munsif, Bhabhua;
(ii) for issuance of writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ for commanding the respondents particularly the respondent No. 4 to start the proceeding of the aforesaid case bearing Bihar Public Land Encroachment Case No. 08/2018 and accordingly, to remove the encroachment from the public land pertaining to Khata No.
257, Plot No. 1222/2614, situated in Mauza Majhari, Thana No. 529, upon which the villagers have constructed their House;
(iii) for issuance of any other appropriate writ, order or direction which your Lordships may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case
3. For want of prosecution, the writ petition is dismissed.
(Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U