Navin Kumar Yadav @ Navin Yadav @ Navin Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.74 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-174 Year-2018 Thana- PIPRA District- Supaul ====================================================== Navin Kumar Yadav @ Navin Yadav @ Navin Kumar Son of Ganesh Yadav, Resident of Village - Rampur, P.S.- Pipra, District - Supaul. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shivpujan Sahay For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sri Panchanand Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 18-01-2019 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Pipra P.S. Case No. 174/2018, instituted for offences under Section(s) 341, 323, 324, 504, 506, 307, 448, 427, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged in the written report that on the date of occurrence brother of informant was levelling the land from soil then this petitioner along with others arrived and started assaulting him with lathi and rod. Hearing the sound of 'Bachao-Bachao', informant reached there. Thereafter Chandrika Devi and Ganesh Yadav also arrived there. Ganesh Yadav ordered to kill the brother of informant then this petitioner assaulted him with Dabia causing injury on his head. Thereafter all the accused persons looted several articles, cash

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.74 of 2019(2) dt.18-01-2019 2/2 etc. from the house of informant.

There is specific allegation against this petitioner of causing injury on the head of brother of informant with Dabia. From the injury report, it appears that brother of informant has sustained grievous injury caused by hard and blunt substance. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. The petitioner may renew prayer for bail after six months in the event no substantial progress is made in the trial. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial. (Sanjay Priya, J) rakhi/- U T