Raj Kishor Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14780 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-192 Year-2020 Thana- TEKARI District- Gaya ====================================================== RAJ KISHOR YADAV Son of Chander Dev Yadav, Resident of villageMatai, P.S. - Tekari (Panchanpur O.P.), District - Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar Yadav For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Arvind Kumar Singh Mr.Mukul Jee Mr.Raj Ballabh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 28-02-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Tekari (Panchanpur O.P.) P.S. Case No.192 of 2020 registered under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that there is a land dispute between the parties. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.

Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail by contending that the petitioner is alleged to have inflicted gadasa

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14780 of 2021(7) dt.28-02-2022 2/2 blow on the head of the father of the informant due to which he sustained grievous injury. Therefore, the petitioner does not deserve anticipatory bail.

Having considered the facts aforesaid, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected. Harish/- (Arvind Srivastava, J) U T