← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./5037/2020dismissed

Muslim Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

2021-02-10Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5037 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-346 Year-2017 Thana- BHABHUA District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== MUSLIM ANSARI Son of Late Asgar Ansari Resident of Village - Khanaw, P.S.- Bhabua, District - Kaimur at Bhabua ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Tribhuwan Narayan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Damodar Prasad Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-02-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in S. Tr. No.353/355 of 2017 arising out of Bhabua P.S. case No.346 of 2017 registered under Sections 302, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act, pending in the court of A.D.J. IV, Kaimur at Bhabua. The earlier bail application of the petitioner was rejected vide Annexure 1 to the present application taking into account that there is specific allegation against the petitioner and other co-accused Rustam Ansari for firing upon the deceased, which led to his death.

A report was called for from the trial court. It has been reported that due to non-appearance of three other accused, the trial of the present petitioner has been separated and the trial is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5037 of 2020(3) dt.10-02-2021 2/2 likely to be concluded within a period of six months. Considering the nature of accusation and the stage of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The same is rejected.

The Trial Court is directed to take all necessary steps to conclude the trial preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The District Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabua and the Superintendent of Police, Kaimur at Bhabua are also directed to take necessary steps to produce the witnesses on the date fixed by the Trial Court so that the trial could be concluded within the stipulated period.

Let this order be communicated to the District Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabua and the Superintendent of Police, Kaimur at Bhabua.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T