Awadesh Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4163 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-41 Year-2021 Thana- JURAWANPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.

Awadesh Chaudhary Son Of Late Rasik Nandan Chaudhary R/O VillagePaharpur East, P.S.- Jurawanpur, District- Vaishali 2.

Anil Kumar Chaudhary @ Anil Chaudhary Son Of Awadhesh Chaudhary R/O Village- Paharpur East, P.S.- Jurawanpur, District- Vaishali 3.

Chandan Kumar Chaudhary @ Chandan Chaudhary Son Of Ram Naresh Chaudhary R/O Village- Paharpur East, P.S.- Jurawanpur, District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajeev Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jitendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 13-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 337, 325, 307, 379, 504, 427 of the Indian Penal Code.

All FIR named persons including the petitioners came at the door of the informant and assaulted him by means of rod, lathi and bricks.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4163 of 2022(2) dt.13-07-2022 2/2 implicated in this case due to land dispute. He submits that there is case and counter case between the parties and both sides have sustained injury. He submits that the injury found upon the victim is simple in nature. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioners. He submits that there is compromise in between the parties. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Jurawanpur P.S. Case No. 41 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T