Rohit Kumar Gupta @ Chhotu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3134 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-566 Year-2019 Thana- PURNEA SADAR District- Purnia ====================================================== Rohit Kumar Gupta @ Chhotu Son of Kailash Pd. Gupta, Resident of Nageshwar Bagh, P.S.- Sadar, District- Purnia ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amrendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Amitesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 28-01-2020 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks bail in Special Case No.31 of 2019, arising out of Sadar P.S. Case No.566 of 2019 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 08/21/22(b) of the NDPS Act.

As per the prosecution report, there is recovery of 13.70 gms of Smack from the possession of the petitioner and also recovery of 12.25 gms. of Smack , kept beneath the dash board of the car, from which they were moving. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he is in custody since 08.11.2019 Further submission is that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. In this case, chargesheet has already been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3134 of 2020(2) dt.28-01-2020 2/2 submitted against the petitioner.

Heard learned Addl. Public Prosecutor.

In view of facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage, however once the charge is framed in this case, the petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application for bail is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) nawalkrs/- U T