← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/24277/2018dfd for non appearance

Ravi Nandan Kumar v. The Honble High Court Of Judicature At Patna Through The Registrar General, High Court, Patna

2022-11-22Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 24277 of 2018 ====================================================== Ravi Nandan Kumar Son of Sudhir Kumar Sharma Resident of 1658 Near Dr. Shipra Sharma Lakhi Bagh Buniyadganj Gaya, P.S. Muffasil, District-Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Hon'ble High Court Of Judicature At Patna Through The Registrar General, High Court, Patna through the Registrar General, High Court Patna. 2.

The Registrar General, High Court Patna.

3.

The Centralized Committee, High Court, Patna through the Registrar General as Member secretary of the Centralized Committee, High Court Patna.

4.

The District and Sessions Judge Patna Cum the Convener Co-Ordination Committee Bihar, Patna.

5.

The Registrar (Administration) High Court, Patna. 6.

The State of Bihar through the Law Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

N O N E For the Respondent/s :

Mr Sunil Kumar Mandal, SC III For the High Cdourt :

Mr Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 22-11-2022 When the matter was listed on 15.11.2022, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. The situation is the same today also.

Learned State Counsel as well as the learned counsel for the High Court submits that in view of the opinion of this Court expressed in CWJC No 21219 of 2018 (Suprabhat Kumar & Others -Versus- State of Bihar & Others) which covers the issues raised in the instant writ proceedings, this writ petition has become infructuous.

Patna High Court CWJC No.24277 of 2018(3) dt.22-11-2022 2/2 Since none appears on behalf of the petitioner, without going into merits of the submission of the learned State Counsel, this writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. (Madhuresh Prasad, J) M.E.H./- U