Abhiranjan Kumar @ Bittu v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.955 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-138 Year-2018 Thana- SAMASTIPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Abhiranjan Kumar @ Bittu S/o Ashok Kumar Ray R/vill-Balua, P.S-Sakra, Dist.-Muzaffarpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Anshu Dhar Sharma, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Sri Uday Chand Prasad (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 28-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Samastipur Town P.S. Case No. 138 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code.
Informant has alleged that on 10.05.2018, he had gone to Durga temple after parking his motorcycle, after sometime, when he returned he did not find his motorcycle. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Nothing was recovered from his house or his possession. He has not been put on T.I.P. Petitioner is in custody since 20.06.2018.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.955 of 2019(3) dt.28-01-2019 2/2 Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Samastipur, in connection with Samastipur Town P.S. Case No. 138 of 2018, subject to conditions:
(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.
(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.
(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/- U T