Vijay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5288 of 2021 ====================================================== Vijay Kumar S/o Late Lala Prasad R/o Mohalla - Kali Sthan, P.O. and P.S. - Hilsa, District - Nalanda.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Bihar, Patna.
3.
The District Magistrate, Nalanda.
4.
The Sub Divisional Officer, Hilsa, District - Nalanda. 5.
The Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad, Hilsa. 6.
Sadhna Devi, the Chief Councillor, Nagar Parishad, Hilsa, Nalanda. 7.
Tribhuwan Kumar, Ward Councillor, Ward No. 20, Nagar Parishad Hilsa, Nalanda.
8.
Vashishta Kumar, Ward Councillor, Ward No. 3, Nagar Parishad Hilsa, Nalanda.
9.
Surendra Kumar, Ward Councillor, Ward No. 15, Nagar Parishad Hilsa, Nalanda.
10.
Shailendra Kumar, Ward Councillor, Ward No. 10, Nagar Parishad Hilsa, Nalanda.
11.
Satyendra Kumar, Ward Councillor, Ward No. 04, Nagar Parishad Hilsa, Nalanda.
12.
Reena Devi, Ward Councillor, Ward No. 19, Nagar Parishad Hilsa, Nalanda. 13.
Harishchandra Yadav, Ward Councillor, Ward No. 09, Nagar Parishad Hilsa, Nalanda.
14.
Mukesh Kumar, Ward Councillor, Ward No. 21, Nagar Parishad Hilsa, Nalanda.
15.
Firoza Bano, Ward Councillor, Ward No. 18, Nagar Parishad Hilsa, Nalanda. 16.
Sabja Devi, Ward Councillor, Ward No. 01, Nagar Parishad Hilsa, Nalanda. 17.
Vijay Kumar Vijeta, Ward Councillor, Ward No. 16, Nagar Parishad Hilsa, Nalanda.
18.
Reeta Devi, Ward Councillor, Ward No. 13, Nagar Parishad Hilsa, Nalanda. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Awadhesh Kumar, Adv.
For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Y.P. Sinha, AAG-7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA
Patna High Court CWJC No.5288 of 2021(2) dt.24-08-2021 2/2 ORAL ORDER 24-08-2021 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by efflux of time the present writ application has become infructuous. Accordingly, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application. Permission is accorded.
The instant writ application stands dismissed as withdrawn being infructuous.
(Anil Kumar Sinha, J) perwez U