Md. Imajuddin @ Imajuddin v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6387 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-32 Year-2023 Thana- KODHOBARI District- Kishanganj ====================================================== Md. Imajuddin @ Imajuddin Son of Ismail Haque Resident of village - Lohagarha, Samed Tola, P.S.- Kodhobari, District - Kishanganj ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Amal Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ahmad Ali, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 04-02-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Kodhobari P.S. Case no.32 of 2023 registered under sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution case, the sister of the informant who was married to the petitioner herein was physically and mentally tortured and ultimately done to death.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case only for the reason that he happens to be the husband of the deceased. No such occurrence as alleged has taken place. The petitioner is in custody since 30.7.2025. The petitioner and the sister of the informant were leading a happy conjugal life for 17 years since
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6387 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 2/2 they were married and they had nine children out of the said wedlock. No external or internal injury was found and it appears that the deceased committed suicide. There is no eye witness to the occurrence.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegation against the petitioner in the FIR, the petitioner being the husband of the deceased, dead body of the deceased having been recovered behind the house of the parents of the second wife of the petitioner, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected.
7. Learned trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. (Partha Sarthy, J) Saurabh/- U T