Chandan Kumar Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.22125 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -69 Year- 2015 Thana -BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBEGUSARAI ======================================================

1. Chandan Kumar Mahto S/o Sri Ramashray Mahto R/o vill- Bishanpurchaturbhuj, P.S.- Begusarai Muffasil Dist.- Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shubhesh Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Abhay Kumar No. 1 (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-07-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under section 376 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is that in the evening of 06.03.2015 at about 7.00 P.M. while the informant went to attained the call of nature in the field, the petitioner arrived there and offered to give her Rs. 5000/- or whatever demand of the victim further as it has been stated that the accused persons started scuffling with her and after opening the cloths he committed evil work and threaten her and also told her to come whenever he call.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22125 of 2015 (2) dt.16-07-2015 2/2 that he has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that petitioner is in custody since 07.03.2015 and charge sheet has already been submitted in the case. It is further submitted that the victim was examined by the doctor but no sign of rape or any mark of violation was found on the body of the victim.

On behalf of the State/informant it is submitted that there is specific allegation against the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The same is rejected. However, the trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same within a period of five months, failing which the petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail. (Sudhir Singh, J) M.Rahman/- U T