← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/1282/2023disposed

Suresh Prasad Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

2023-03-24Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1282 of 2023 ====================================================== Suresh Prasad Mandal S/o Upendor Mandal R/o Village- Palwa, P.O. Nadiyami, P.S. Jamalpur, District- Darbhanga, presently residing at House No. C-4/27, B 1st Floor, Bhatis House, Achraya Niketan Mayur Phase-1, Mayur Vihar, East Delhi, Delhi-110091.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Prohibition Excise and Registration Department, Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Prohibition Excise and Registration Department, Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Inspector General of Registration-cum-Excise Commissioner, Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Assistant Inspector General of Registration, Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga.

5.

The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, District- Darbhanga at Darbhanga. 6.

The District Sub Registrar, Bahera, District- Darbhanga. 7.

The District Sub Registrar, Biraul, District- Darbhanga. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shadwal Harsh For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Vivek Prasad ( Gp 7 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 24-03-2023 In pursuance to the earlier order of this Court dated 16.3.2023, the Assistant Inspector General of Registration, Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga, has passed an order dated 17.3.2023, whereby and whereunder the impugned order dated 21.11.2022, passed by the Assistant Inspector General of Registration, Darbhanga Division, in Stamp Case No. 197 of 2022-23, imposing the demand of deficit stamp duty along with penalty and interest, has been annulled.

Patna High Court CWJC No.1282 of 2023(3) dt.24-03-2023 2/2 In such view of the matter, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is no longer aggrieved by any action of the Respondent authorities, hence, the petitioner does not propose to press the present writ petition. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed off as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U