Sundar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4333 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-303 Year-2021 Thana- KHUSRUPUR District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

SUNDAR SINGH S/o- LATE DWARIKA SINGH Resident of VillageChhota Hasanpur, P.S.-Khushrupur, District- Patna. 2.

Smt. Kanti Devi W/o Sunder Singh Resident of Village- Chhota Hasanpur, P.S.-Khushrupur, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Yogendra Kumar Mr. Durgesh Nandan Mr. Ranjan Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 25-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 325, 504, 506, 307, 324 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Petitioners are said to have assaulted the informant by means of deadly weapons as a result of which he received injury.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4333 of 2022(2) dt.25-07-2022 2/2 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case due to land dispute. He submits that there is case and counter case between the parties and both sides have sustained injury. He submits that the injury found upon the victim is simple in nature. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application. Learned APP for the State and informant oppose the prayer for bail and submit that witnesses have supported the allegation and the injury report given in the case diary in which it is stated that there are multiple injuries including one stab wound.

Considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, their prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected in connection with Khushrupur P.S. Case No. 303 of 2021.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T