Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6831/2024bail rejected

Nausad Ansari @ Nausad Alam @ Naushad Ansari @ Nawasad Ansari @ Naushad Alam v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-03Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6831 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-27 Year-2022 Thana- BHANGHA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Nausad Ansari @ Nausad Alam @ Naushad Ansari @ Nawasad Ansari @ Naushad Alam son of Wasir Mian @ Nasir Mian village- Suryapur PSBhangaha District- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ramakant Sharma, Sr. Adv.

Mr.Mayank Raj, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajendra Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 03-04-2024 Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with S.Tr. No.580 of 2022, arising out of Bhangha P.S. Case No. 27 of 2022 dated 06.05.2022, lodged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504 and 506 of the I.P.C. and later on section 302 of the I.P.C.

3. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the bail application of the petitioner has earlier been rejected vide order dated 22.02.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No.58296 of 2022 in which direction was given to the trial court to conclude the trial within 9 months. If the trial has not been concluded within a period of 9 months, the petitioner shall be at

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6831 of 2024(3) dt.03-04-2024 2/2 liberty to move to the Court again.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that as per his knowledge, the trial has not concluded till date. He further submits that report has been called for, in which court has submitted that the trial is likely to be concluded within 5 months whereas counsel for the informant submits that case has been fixed for argument.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

6. In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Therefore, the bail application of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

7. However, trial court is directed to conclude the trial within 2 months. If the trial shall not be concluded within two months, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail. (Dr. Anshuman, J.) Prakashmani/- U T