Ranjan Yadav @ Ranjan Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4429 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-183 Year-2024 Thana- KALUAHI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Ranjan Yadav @ Ranjan Kumar Yadav S/O Dhanik Yadav R/o village - Kaluahi , P.S.- kaluahi , District - Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ravi Prakash For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Prem Kumar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 12-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with G.R. No. 1328 of 2024 arising out of Kaluahi P.S. Case No. 183 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Section 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 41, 47 and 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022.
3. The learned counsel submits that the petitioner has antecedent of two cases and allegation is of recovery of 82.8 litres of liquor from an auto. It is next submitted that the petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and is not the owner of the seized vehicle and he came to be implicated based on secret information, which is the easiest way to implicate someone.
4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4429 of 2025(2) dt.12-02-2025 2/2 anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on Provisional Anticipatory Bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with G.R. No. 1328 of 2024 arising out of Kaluahi P.S. Case No. 183 of 2024 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
6. However, it is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that the petitioner has more than two antecedent, in that event the provisional anticipatory bail shall not be confirmed, but if on verification if it is found that the petitioner has antecedent of two cases, in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith. (Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T