← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6123/2025bail rejected

Monu Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-09Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh6 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6123 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-293 Year-2024 Thana- SHAMBHUGANJ District- Banka ====================================================== Monu Kumar Singh Son of Jainandra Prasad Singh Resident of Village - Gulni, P.O. - Gulni Kushaha, P.S. - Shambhuganj, District - Banka ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 6551 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-293 Year-2024 Thana- SHAMBHUGANJ District- Banka ====================================================== Bandana Devi W/o- Abhiram Singh Resident of village- Gulani Nagatola PSShambhuganj District-Banka ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 6676 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-293 Year-2024 Thana- SHAMBHUGANJ District- Banka ====================================================== Shobha Devi W/o- Ajit Prasad Singh @ Jakho R/o vilage- Gulai , P.s.- Banka , District -Banka ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 6123 of 2025) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Md.Najmul Hodda, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Surendra Kumar , APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 6551 of 2025) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rana Ishwar Chandra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Lalan Kumar , APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 6676 of 2025) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Krishna Prasad Singh, Advocate Mr. Brij Nandan Prasad , Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh, APP ======================================================

2/6 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-05-2025 Regarding Cr. Misc. No. 6123 of 2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State .

petitioner is not named in the F.I.R., The name of the petitioner transpired during course of investigation on the confessional statement of injured Ayush Kumar. Except confessional statement there is no other material on record to show the complicity of this petitioner in this case . As a matter of fact, there was love affairs between deceased Ayush Kumar and one Amrita Kumari and petitioner has got no concern with the alleged occurrence . Petitioner claims clean antecedent. Petitioner is in custody since 18.10.2024 .

3/6

6. Considering the nature of accusation , material available on record and gravity of offence , I am not inclined to interfere with the order impugned and as such , prayer for regular bail of the petitioner is rejected.

Regarding Cr. Misc. No. 6676 of 2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State .

4/6 petitioner is not named in the F.I.R., Petitioner has been made accused in this case because she happens to be mother of Amrita Kumari. As a matter of fact, there was love affair between son of informant and Amrita Kumari and petitioner has got no concern with the alleged occurrence . Petitioner claims clean antecedent. Petitioner is in custody since 13.11.2024 .

6. Considering the nature of accusation , material available on record and gravity of offence , I am not inclined to interfere with the order impugned and as such , prayer for regular bail of the petitioner is rejected.

Regarding Cr. Misc. No. 6551 of 2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State .

5/6 petitioner is not named in the F.I.R., The name of the petitioner transpired during course of investigation on the confessional statement of injured Ayush Kumar. Except confessional statement there is no other material on record to show the complicity of this petitioner in this case . As a matter of fact, there was love affair between son of informant and Amrita Kumari and petitioner has got no concern with the alleged occurrence . Petitioner claims clean antecedent. Petitioner is in custody since 18.10.2024 .

6/6

6. Considering the nature of accusation , material available on record and gravity of offence , I am not inclined to interfere with the order impugned and as such , prayer for regular bail of the petitioner is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U T