Kaisar Jahan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2123 of 2024 ====================================================== Kaisar Jahan Wife of Rukshad Ahmad, Daughter of Md. Shafiq Khan @ Md. Shafiq Resident of Vilage-Budhaura Kumbhapur P.O. Hariharganj P.S. and Tahseel Raniganj, District, Pratapgarh, Uttar Pradesh, PIN-230304. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Additional Chief Secreary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 2.

The Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

3.

The Director, Secondary Education, Directorate of Education, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat Patna.

4.

The Bihar Public Service Commission through its Secretary, Baily Road, Patna, Bihar.

5.

The Joint Secretary Cum Controller of Examination, Bihar Public Service Commission, Baily Road, Patna, Bihar.

6.

The District Education Officer, Buxar, Bihar. 7.

The District Programme Officer (Establishment) Buxar, Bihar. 8.

The Principal, M.P. High School, Buxar, Bihar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Farooque Azam, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Sumant Kr. Singh, AC to GA-2 For the BPSC :

Mr. Sanjay Pandey, Advocate Mr. Nishant Kr. Jha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 17-10-2024 This writ application has been filed for commanding the concerned respondent to allow the petitioner to appear in the counseling and further directing the respondent no. 8 to accept the joining of petitioner in the M.P. High School, Buxar, after her proper selection by the Bihar Public Service Commission (for

Patna High Court CWJC No.2123 of 2024 dt.17-10-2024 2/2 short "B.P.S.C."), pursuant to Advertisement No. - 26/2023, alongwith corrigendum letter dated 27.06.2023.

2. At the outset, by referring to paragraph 7 of the counter affidavit filed on behalf of Respondent no. 3, learned State counsel submits that petitioner does not have requisite qualification for appointment as Computer Teacher in Higher Secondary School. Learned State counsel next submits that for appointment of Primary Teacher, Secondary Teacher and Higher Secondary Teacher, the candidate must have passed S.T.E.T. Paper - II examination, but the petitioner does not have requisite qualification and as such, she was not allowed to join.

3. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the writ petition stands dismissed.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Anay AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 19.10.2024 Transmission Date N/A