Mayank Kumar @ Mayik Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.14240 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -478 Year- 2015 Thana -MUZAFFARPUR SADAR DistrictMUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== Mayank Kumar @ Mayik Kumar Son of Umesh Prasad Thakur resident of village - Patahi Jagarnath, P.S. Sadar, District - Muzaffarpur .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Yugal Kishore For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Indra Kr. Singh (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 12-05-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 478 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 387, 447 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of the Explosive Substance Act.

Allegedly, due to non-fulfillment of demand of ransom, the petitioner and co-accused Vikas Kumar came on motorcycle at the shop of the informant and the petitioner threw bomb which fell on the cloth resulting same was not exploded but the bag containing another bomb fell down and both the accused fled away. Through mobile also ransom was demanded and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14240 of 2016 (3) dt.12-05-2016 2/3 message was given.

Submission is of false implication and that the informant has lodged three cases against the petitioner falsely and one case has been lodged at the instance of the informant, no injury has been caused to anyone and after implanting bomb, the informant has implicated the petitioner and co-accused resulting the petitioner is suffering in custody since 12.01.2016. The learned A.P.P opposes the prayer of the bail by submitting that the petitioner has got criminal antecedent. In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the enmity between the petitioner and the informant and further that no injury has been caused to anyone and as submitted, three cases have been lodged by the informant against the petitioner and as such, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs.

10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14240 of 2016 (3) dt.12-05-2016 3/3 default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Mishra/- U T