Manish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.14545 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -65 Year- 2016 Thana -KANKARBAGH District- PATNA ======================================================
1. Manish Kumar, son of Sri Ram Narain Prasad, resident of E-65, P.C. Colony, Kankarbagh, P.S. Kankarbagh, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Kumar @ Alok Kr Shahi For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Gajendra Pd. Yadav(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 08-04-2016 Supplementary affidavit is filed on behalf of the petitioner.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner got issued a SIM on the ID of informant of the present case and, after that, he made a call for ransom through the aforesaid SIM.
The contention on behalf of the petitioner is that the so called SIM had been issued on 21.01.2016 and according to the case of the informant, the ransom call was made on 05.01. 2016 which was not possible. Moreover, petitioner does not have any criminal antecedent and, as a matter of fact, the informant lodged this false case against the petitioner as there was sweet relation
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14545 of 2016 (2) dt.08-04-2016 2/2 between the petitioner and daughter of the informant. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties and also taking note of this fact that petitioner is in jail custody since 31.01.2015, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st class, Patna in connection with Kankarbagh P.S.Case No. 65 of 2016. However, it is made clear that if the petitioner makes any attempt to tamper with the prosecution evidence, the learned court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after due and proper inquiry.
(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) N.K/- U T