← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/7546/2017disposed

Yugal Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-08-08The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7546 of 2017 ======================================================

1. Yugal Prasad, Son of Late Moti Singh, resident of Village- Nichlikila, Garh Par, Bihar Sharif, P.O. & P.S.- Bihar Sharif, District- Nalanda. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. Principal Secretary, General Administration, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. Under Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5. District Magistrate, Bihar Sharif, Nalanda.

6. Municipal Corporation, Bihar Sharif through its Chief Executive Officer, Municipal Corporation, Bihar Sharif, District- Nalanda.

7. Municipal Commissioner, Bihar Sharif, Municipal Corporation, Bihar Sharif, District- Nalanda.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhishek For the Respondent/s : Mr. Yogendra Prasad Sinha-Aag7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR PADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 08-08-2017 Keeping in view the counter affidavit filed by the respondents and copies of the order dated 5.7.2017, Annexure C filed by the Under Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department closing the enquiry for the reasons indicated therein, no further action is required to be taken in the matter. In case the petitioner is aggrieved with the manner in which the order dated 5.7.2017 has been passed by the Under

Patna High Court CWJC No.7546 of 2017 (4) dt.08-08-2017 2/2 Secretary, based on the decision of the Appellate Authority contained in Annexure 5, petitioner shall have liberty to challenge the same or any action in pursuance thereof in accordance with law in an appropriate proceeding. With the aforesaid, this appeal is disposed of. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) K.C.jha/- U