Patna High CourtC. REV./177/2017disposed

Shailendra Kumar Ojha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-08-31The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Review No.177 of 2017 In LPA 1288 of 2015 ====================================================== Shailendra Kumar Ojha, son of Shree Hridyanand Ojha, the Acting Headmaster of Project Girls High School Chand, Police Station- Chand, istrict- Kaimur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Vikas Bhawan, Patna

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Vikas Bhawan, Patna

3. The Director (Secondary Education), Department of Education, Bihar Secondary Education Office, Budh Marg, Patna

4. The Deputy Director (Secondary Education), Incharge Project Schools, Department of Education, Bihar Secondary Education Office, Budh Marg, Patna

5. District Education Officer, Kaimur .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bijay Kumar Pandey For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey (AAG 15) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 31-08-2017 This application has been filed for review of the order dated 08.04.2017 passed in LPA No. 1288 of 2015. Taking note of the grounds taken in the review application, we find that there are no grounds on the basis of which review is permissible. The principles laid down in the case of Sasi (Dead) through Legal Representatives Vs.

Aravindakshanair and others: (2017) 4 SCC 692 permit review on limited ground and the ground raised in this application do not

Patna High Court C. REV. No.177 of 2017 (3) dt.31-08-2017 2/2 fall in the category of grounds as are contemplated in that case. In that view of the matter, we find no ground to review the order. The review petition is dismissed. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) S.Pandey/- U