Deepak Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15234 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-118 Year-2020 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Patna ====================================================== Deepak Kumar Son Of Ramanand Choudhary Resident Of Village- Vijaypur, P.S.- Mean, District- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar Saxena For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Renuka Ratnakar :

Mr. Ajit Kumar :

Mr. Sudarshan Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 07-10-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State through virtual court proceeding.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks of resumption of normal court proceeding. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 118 of 2020 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 376 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is that petitioner had established physical relationship with the informant/victim on the promise of marriage. It is also alleged that the accused petitioner demanded Rs. 5,00000/- as dowry is she wants to marry him.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15234 of 2021(3) dt.07-10-2021 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. He submits that after investigation Police has submitted the final form against the petitioner but on the protest petition filed by the informant the learned Court below has taken cognizance against the petitioner. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has been languishing in custody since 11.10.2020.

Learned APP for the State opposed the bail petition. Considering the facts aforesaid and the fact that final form has been submitted by the Police against the petitioner, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 118 of 2020.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) GAURAV S./- U T