Patna High CourtCR. MISC./23740/2015bail granted

Rudal Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2015-07-29Justice Smt. Anjana Prakash2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.23740 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -257 Year- 2012 Thana -MAHUA District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================

1. Rudal Paswan Son of Late Jay Dayal Paswan Resident of Village - Tajpur Bujurg, P.S. Mahua, District - Vaishali .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dinesh Singh (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 29-07-2015 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner was refused bail by the order dated 23.12.2014 passed in Cr. Misc. 51104 of 2014 but with liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. Annexure-3 reveals that now charges have been framed.

In view of such, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No. 257 of 2012, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23740 of 2015 (2) dt.29-07-2015 2/2 he is related with the Petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the Petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is, he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the Petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

(Anjana Prakash, J) S.Ali/- U T