Rishikesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12371 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-605 Year-2023 Thana- PATRAKARNAGAR District- Patna ====================================================== Rishikesh Kumar (Male), Aged About 18 Years, S/O Sri Anuj Kumar @ Anuj Prasad R/O- Manpura Bairia, Ps. Gopalpur, Dist. Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Rita Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 27-02-2024 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Patrakar Nagar P.S. Case No.-605 of 2023 pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Patna registered for the offence under Sections 406, 419, 420 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

3.

As per the prosecution case, it is a case of Cyber crime of Rs.70,000/- in the eight ATM by the petitioner. 4.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 06.08.2023.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12371 of 2024(2) dt.27-02-2024 2/2 5.

Learned APP appearing for the State, opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 6.

On perusal of the first information report and the impugned order dated 11.12.2023, it appears that the FIR registered against the petitioner under Sections 406, 419, 420 and 120(B) of the IPC and the seizure list also appears that said amount was recovered from the possession of the petitioner and the allegation is very serious and there is no explanation of these recovered amount and article, in these circumstances, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Prayer for regular bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

8. However, the trial Court is directed to conclude the trial within a period of one year from the date of receipt of this order and if the trial is not concluded, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail before the trial Court.

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T