Vishnudeo Yadav @ Vishnudeo Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar Through The Director General Of Police, Bihar, Patna And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.702 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5 Year-2017 Thana- BISFI District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.

Vishnudeo Yadav @ Vishnudeo Singh and Ors Son of Shri Rajendra yadav. 2.

Kranti Kishlay , Son of Shri Vishnudeo Yadav. 3.

Shanta Kumari @ Shanta Singh, Wife of Shri Vishnundeo Yadav. 4.

Pushpranjan @ Chhotu Yadav, Son of Shri Vishundeo Yadav. 5.

Rajendra Yadav, Son of Late Jhauli Yadav, All are Resident of VillageNoorchak , P.S.- Bisfi, District- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar Through The Director General Of Police, Bihar, Patna and Ors 2.

The Superintendent of Police, Madhubani.

3.

The Officer In Charge, Benipatti, Police Station, District Madhubani. 4.

Munni Devi, Wife of late Tirath Yadav, Resident of Village- Noorchak, P.S.- Bisfi, District- Madhubani.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar, AC to AG ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 21-07-2022 No one appears for the petitioner.

This writ application has been preferred for quashing of the first information report of Bisffi P.S. Case No. 05 of 2017 registered for the offence under Section 306/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Earlier when the writ application was taken up for consideration, no one had appeared on behalf of the petitioner but this Court adjourned the matter by way of last indulgence.

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.702 of 2017(3) dt.21-07-2022 2/2 Today once again no one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ application.

A perusal of the reliefs in the writ application shows that it is in respect of a first information report which was lodged in the year 2017. There is no information as to whether the investigation of the case has been completed and the learned court below has proceeded with the matter or not. In absence of further information, this Court finds no reason to keep the writ application pending. It is being disposed off as having become infructuous but with liberty to the petitioner that in case he gets aggrieved by the result of the investigation or the subsequent order passed by the learned court below, liberty will be there for him to seek his remedy in accordance with law.

This application stands disposed off accordingly. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J.) Rajeev/- U Note: The ordersheet duly signed has been attached with the record. However, in view of the present arrangements, during Pandemic period all concerned shall act on the basis of the copy of the order uploaded on the High Court website under the heading 'Judicial Orders Passed During The Pandemic Period'.