Sunil Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4965 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-64 Year-2024 Thana- Salmari District- Katihar ====================================================== Sunil Kumar Yadav S/O Sripati Yadav Resident of village- Nasirganj Nekula (Nokula) P.S- Balia, Belon, District- Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bimal Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Priya Sharan Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Salmari P.S. Case No. 64/2024 dated 13.09.2024 registered for the offence punishable u/s 309(4) of the B.N.S. and Sections 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, three miscreants ridden on the motorcycle are alleged to have intercepted the informant and snatched the bag containing ornaments on the point of pistol. In the meantime, one miscreant was apprehended by the nearby people whereas the other two miscreants succeeded to flee away from the place of occurrence. Further, on search of the apprehended person, namely, Md. Armaan, a loaded pistol, a desi katta and a motorcycle were recovered.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4965 of 2025(2) dt.03-03-2025 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged occurrence. The apprehended person disclosed the name of the petitioner. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 19.09.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Katihar in connection with Salmari P.S. Case No. 64/2024.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/- U T