Meena Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3780 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-380 Year-2019 Thana- SIRDALA District- Nawada ====================================================== MEENA DEVI Wife of Sahdeo Rajvanshi Resident of Village -Pirauta, P.S.- Sirdala, District-Nawada.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Krishna Deo Raj For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Naresh Ray ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 21-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 326 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

Informant has alleged in his fardebyan that he was working in his field and his son Mithilesh Kumar came to him and while they were returning, FIR named accused caught hold of his son and assaulted him. Allegation against petitioner is that she caught waist of son of informant as a result of which he fell down and other accused thereafter assaulted him and he died.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that she is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner is a lady having no criminal antecedent and she is in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3780 of 2020(2) dt.21-01-2020 2/2 custody since 09.09.2019.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Sirdala P.S. Case No. 380/2019 with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T