Chandramani Ray @ Chandramani Yadav, v. The State Of Bihar,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4607 of 2020 ====================================================== 1.

Chandramani Ray @ Chandramani Yadav, S/o- Parmeshwar Ray, Resident of village- Magurgarh, P.s.- Rosera, Dist.- Samastipur. 2.

Jaimala Kumari @ Devi, W/o Mahanand Rai, Resident of village- Massena, P.s.- Khanpur Dist.- Samastipur.

3.

Ram Pravesh Prasad Singh @ Ram Pravesh Mahto, son of late Jivalal Prasad Singh, Resident of village Girdharpur, P.S. Hasanpur, Dist- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of General Administration, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms, Govt. of Bihar.

4.

The Director Mass Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 5.

The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, District- Samastipur. 6.

The District Education Officer, District- Samastipur. 7.

The District Programme Officer, (Literacy), District- Samastipur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mira Kumari, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mrs. Shilpa Singh (GA12) :

Mrs. Namrata Singh, AC to Ex. GA12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 05-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous on account of judgment dated 05.07.2023 rendered by Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in Civil Review No.59 of 2018 (The State of Bihar & Ors. Vs. Harendra Mishra & Ors.). and

Patna High Court CWJC No.4607 of 2020(3) dt.05-04-2024 2/2 the same may be disposed off accordingly. The operative portion of the said judgment is extracted as under:- "As has been discussed above, as the writ petitioners had admittedly not approached this Court or the Supreme Court on or before 26.02.2016, no relief could have been granted to them. The writ petition filed by them, i.e., CWJC No. 384 of 2017, deserved to be dismissed. Accordingly, we set aside the order dated 03.03.2017 passed in CWJC No. 384 of 2017."

3. In this view of the matter, the present writ petition is hereby disposed off.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) Prakashmani/- U